Tuesday, December 1, 2009

Dear America (True Thanksgiving)

In uploading backup disks to my new computer, somehow, I caused problems with my flash video and this youtube ceased working and I deleted it. I have re-installed the necessary software and I am re-posting the youtube which I fee especially appropriate this time of year:

Monday, November 30, 2009

Harvard Study: Planned Parenthood is an Abortion Business and Business is Bad

[From Life News]
by Mauricio Roman
November 30, 2009

Mauricio Roman is a freelance journalist based out of Costa Rica. This article originally appeared on the web site Inside Catholic.

Despite profits of $85 million in 2008, Planned Parenthood is facing serious financial difficulties.

According to a recent Harvard Business School case study, Planned Parenthood Federation of America (PPFA) is structured as a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization with multiple affiliates, each of which is also a 501(c)(3) non-profit. The national entity lobbies on national policy, sets affiliation standards, and leases its "Planned Parenthood" brand to affiliates, each of which has its own independent board and management structure, and so enjoys independence in its day-to-day operations.

Internally, Planned Parenthood's difficulties stem from the uneven strength of its affiliates, and President Cecile Richards is worried. Read article here

Sunday, November 22, 2009

By the President of the United States of America, a Proclamation.

Whereas it is the duty of all Nations to acknowledge the providence of Almighty God, to obey his will, to be grateful for his benefits, and humbly to implore his protection and favor-- and whereas both Houses of Congress have by their joint Committee requested me to recommend to the People of the United States a day of public thanksgiving and prayer to be observed by acknowledging with grateful hearts the many signal favors of Almighty God especially by affording them an opportunity peaceably to establish a form of government for their safety and happiness.

Now therefore I do recommend and assign Thursday the 26th day of November next to be devoted by the People of these States to the service of that great and glorious Being, who is the beneficent Author of all the good that was, that is, or that will be-- That we may then all unite in rendering unto him our sincere and humble thanks--for his kind care and protection of the People of this Country previous to their becoming a Nation--for the signal and manifold mercies, and the favorable interpositions of his Providence which we experienced in the course and conclusion of the late war--for the great degree of tranquility, union, and plenty, which we have since enjoyed--for the peaceable and rational manner, in which we have been enabled to establish constitutions of government for our safety and happiness, and particularly the national One now lately instituted--for the civil and religious liberty with which we are blessed; and the means we have of acquiring and diffusing useful knowledge; and in general for all the great and various favors which he hath been pleased to confer upon us.

and also that we may then unite in most humbly offering our prayers and supplications to the great Lord and Ruler of Nations and beseech him to pardon our national and other transgressions-- to enable us all, whether in public or private stations, to perform our several and relative duties properly and punctually--to render our national government a blessing to all the people, by constantly being a Government of wise, just, and constitutional laws, discreetly and faithfully executed and obeyed--to protect and guide all Sovereigns and Nations (especially such as have shewn kindness unto us) and to bless them with good government, peace, and concord--To promote the knowledge and practice of true religion and virtue, and the encrease of science among them and us--and generally to grant unto all Mankind such a degree of temporal prosperity as he alone knows to be best.

Given under my hand at the City of New York the third day of October in the year of our Lord 1789.

(signed) G. Washington

Source: The Massachusetts Centinel, Wednesday, October 14, 1789

Thursday, November 19, 2009

Planned Parenthood fulfilling founder's vision

Mark Caserta

November 19, 2009 @ 12:00 AM

The Herald-Dispatch

When Margaret Sanger, famous birth control activist, founded Planned Parenthood in 1916, her vision for society was not unlike another notable historical figure of the past who believed in the self-direction of human evolution.

Adolph Hitler.

A controversial eugenicist, Margaret Sanger believed, "The most merciful thing that a large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it."
. . .
In her book, Sanger went on to refer to blacks, immigrants and indigents as "... human weeds,' reckless breeders,' and 'spawning ... human beings who never should have been born." Read article from Herald Dispatch Com here.

Saturday, November 14, 2009

Pro-Abortion Groups Threaten to Yank Election Funding for Pro-Stupak Lawmakers

Pro-Abortion Groups Threaten to Yank Election Funding for congressmen who voted for the Stupak amendment to the health bill, e.g., an amendment to the government-run health care reform bill that would strip abortion funding from it. Story Below:
Pro-Abortion Groups Threaten to Yank Election Funding for Pro-Stupak Lawmakers
by Steven Ertelt
LifeNews.com Editor
November 13, 2009

Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- Members of Congress voted to protect the pocketbooks of taxpayers from having the government use them as a funding source for abortions. But for the pro-abortion lawmakers who supported the Stupak amendment to the health care bill, their own pocketbooks may be in jeopardy.

That's because leading pro-abortion groups Planned Parenthood and NARAL are threatening to revoke campaign funding for two pro-abortion lawmakers who backed the amendment.

Reps. Ciro Rodriguez and Harry Teague, Democrats from Texas and New Mexico, have received campaign financing from the abortion advocacy groups. Read entire article here.It is no surprise that organizations that would kill he pre-born would take economic vengeance against pro-abortion legislators that dared to vote against their interests.

Sunday, November 8, 2009

Health Care Bill Gets House Approval, Abortion Funding Battle Shifts to Senate

by Steven Ertelt
LifeNews.com Editor
November 6, 2009

Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- The health care bill in Congress received its first favorable vote in a chamber of Congress on virtually a very narrow vote Saturday night. Passage of the legislation came after lawmakers voted for the Stupak amendment to remove abortion funding from the legislation.

The House voted 220 to 215 with 39 Democrats joining 176 republicans to oppose it and 219 Democrats and one Republican in favor.

Although the Stupak amendment removes the abortion funding under the public option and affordability credits, not all of the pro-life concerns are resolved with the bill. Read more here.

Thursday, November 5, 2009

After Seeing An Ultrasound of An Abortion, Local Planned Parenthood Director Resigns

Abby Johnson saw an abortion on ultrasound. This influenced her to resign from her position as director of a local Planned Parenthood clinic.
From KBTX.COM
Updated: 12:02 AM Nov 2, 2009
Planned Parenthood Director Leaves, Has Change of Heart

Planned Parenthood has been a part of Abby Johnson's life for the past eight years; that is until last month, when Abby resigned. Johnson said she realized she wanted to leave, after watching an ultrasound of an abortion procedure.

"I just thought I can't do this anymore, and it was just like a flash that hit me and I thought that's it," said Jonhson.

She handed in her resignation October 6. Johnson worked as the Bryan Planned Parenthood Director for two years. Read Story Here.

The influence seeing an ultrasound has on a woman planning on aborting her baby, then changing her mind to wanting to keep the baby to term, has been demonstrated, and is the reason why Planned Parenthood is behind opposing laws and local ordinances that require ultrasounds prior to abortions.

Thursday, October 29, 2009

Kansas Legislature Working To Enhance State Sovereignty Under The Tenth Amendment

Commentary—Rick

I posted this on my other blog: The Constitution of our forefathers, but I am also posting it here as it relates to pro-life vs abortion. One of the greatest anti-Tenth Amendment decisions in recent history was the 1973 Roe V Wade decision by the U.S. Supreme Court, which took away the decision of defining abortion from the states and put it under federal jurisdiction. The argument is not whether abortion was legal or not, but which laws should define it, state or federal. If we ever wish to repeal Roe v Wade, we must assert state's rights under the Tenth Amendment, along with replacing progressives in Congress with true constructionist constitutional conservatives.

And in that context, I wish to report on two proposed Amendments to the Kansas Constitution, which, if passed by the voters of Kansas, will ensure the sovereignty of Kansas to protect our rights guaranteed under the Bill of Rights to the U.S. Constitution.

ONE: In March of this year, the Kansas Legislature overwhelmingly approved a constitutional amendment to protect our individual rights to gun ownership. The Resolution, SCR 1611, was sponsored by Senator Tim Huelskamp, Senator Mike Peterson, and others, and was approved by the House. It will go to a vote of the citizens of Kansas in November 2010!

With this proposed constitutional amendment, we shall ensure we have an individual right to gun ownership in Kansas, stating that our state has the sovereign right to uphold the individual rights of the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution regardless of unconstitutional laws and activist judge’s decisions contrariwise. This is a great victory for the 2nd Amendment in Kansas!

This is a Firearms Freedom Act, similar to that passed by other states. For information on what other states are doing, Click here.

TWO: Tuesday, Oct. 27, Kansas State Legislators announced a Kansas Health Care Freedom Amendment as they traveled in areas throughout Kansas from Wichita, to Emporia, Topeka, and Overland Park. Americans for Prosperity supplied a bus that transported them from city to city.

The state sovereignty resolution will send a message to the federal government, and it is a powerful message when other states are sending the same message. The Health Care Freedom Amendment, however, does much more than send a message. If passed, it will be an amendment to the Kansas Constitution, acting to preserve the freedom of Kansans to provide for their health care. See what other states are doing. Click here.

Mary Pilcher Cook is leading the fight in the Kansas Senate to defend Kansas State Sovereignty and the 10th Amendment of the United States Constitution. She has a resolution, SCR 1615, and needs your support. To read a letter from Mary and to add your name as a signature, visit her special page showing the letter, including a link to the bill. To add your name to the letter, please e-mail us at tenthamendment@pilchercook.com and include your name and city! Thank you.

Go to her web page for more information: Click Here.

Monday, October 26, 2009

How Kansas and Missouri Representatives Voted for the Hate Crimes Bill

The Democrats added the so-called hate crimes amendment to the Department of Defense Authorization, FY 2010 Bill, and below is how the Kansas and Missouri Representatives voted on it. This deceptive move by the Democrats was a maneuver calculated to pass an unpopular amendment by attaching it to a 'must pass' bill.

How the U.S. House from Kansas voted:
Rep. Lynn Jenkins (R-2) Yes
Rep. Dennis Moore (D-3) Yes
Rep. Jerry Moran (R-1) No
Rep. Todd Tiahrt (R-4) No

Kansas Senators: Sam Brownback and Pat Roberts both voted no.

How the U.S. House from Missouri voted:
Rep. Todd Akin (R-2) No
Rep. Roy Blunt (R-7) No
Rep. Russ Carnahan (D-3) Yes
Rep. Wm. Lacy Clay (D-1) Yes
Rep. Emanuel Cleaver, II (D-5) Yes
Rep. Jo Ann Emerson (R-8) No
Rep. Sam Graves (R-6) No
Rep. Blaine Luetkemeyer (R-9) Yes
Rep. Ike Skelton (D-4) Yes

Missouri Senators: Kit Bond and Claire McCaskill both voted Yes.

We should write, call, or email each of them to let them know we either appreciate or disapprove of their vote.

Friday, October 23, 2009

Why The Congressional Delay On Passing A Health Reform Bill?

Commentary

I’ve been following health reform since Candidate Obama promised, midst many other promises, that he would sign a universal health care bill within a short time after winning the presidency.

But, as of October 2009, we still do not see a health care bill. Neither do we see other campaign promised fulfilled, including Gitmo closed He promised not to tax anyone earning under $50,000—or was it under $250,000, 240,000, 200,000, or 150,000–who knows. He promised a five day period of review before either house passes a bill, to not approve any earmarks, but the first bill he signed included 9,000 of them, and many other promises that have failed.

I remember that passing a universal health care bill was one of Barack Obama’s major goals. He obviously has a lot of support. But, what has happened?

President Obama has garnered the support of the American Nurses Association, the American Medical Association (with only a fraction of American doctors involved), an agreement from drug companies to make prescription drugs more affordable for seniors, which AARP supports.

The Democrats are continually pressured by Planned Parenthood, Naral, various Hispanic groups, i.e., National Council of La Raza, the Chicana Latina Foundation, Latin American Youth Center, National Latina Health Network, Congresso de Hispanics Unidos, and the Mexican American Legal Defense & Educational Fund to include abortion costs in any health bill passed. This is interesting as most Hispanics are pro-life.

We add unions such as UAW, the AFL-CIO, SEIU, and many smaller unions which are on board with a government health care package.

Then, we have many organizations against a government health care program for various reasons: Pro-life groups against taxpayer support of abortions, gun owners, Second Amendment support groups against an administration against gun ownership, and conservative groups against big government and high taxes, and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce who are against government policies destroying capitalism. The Democrats, who are financially supported by numerous special interest groups, are calling those groups against universal health care, ‘special interest groups.’

We know that the Republicans in congress in general are against a government sponsored bill. But, now we are seeing Blue-dog Democrats against a government health care, including a bill with a public option. And it has not been un-noticed that Republicans have been left out of many health care meeting.

One group, made up of individual citizens, which the government and many of the leftist news organizations are ignoring or trying to minimize, are beginning to make their voices heard. The tea party members and other citizens are flooding the White House, Senators, and Congressional Representatives with emails and telephone calls to the extent that switchboards and computer servers occasionally go down.

But a sleeping giant has been awakened, and a corrupt government will be hearing more and more from it.